Thursday, October 21, 2010
Maus II Part 1
I thought there were some very good questions brought up during the discussion but not all of them were answered and not all of them were answered fully enough. I'm not sure if this was because people did not know the answer to what was being asked or if they were afraid to add in their opinions of things. While I was reading I was confused by a lot of things and I had a lot of questions that came into my mind. It would have been helpful to have had some of those questions talked about but I felt like it was hard to discuss this book specifically because there are so many possible interpretations of each saying and picture. On the other hand, hearing how each person interpreted it differently would have helped get ideas about what was going on and why things were written and drawn the way they were. I found it really interesting how Spiegelman wove in parts of his present day life with the story of his parents time in Auschwitz. I also wondered what the significance of taking pages to explain things going on with his father and his current day life was.
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
The Congo Today
1. I am finding that there are lots of power hungry leaders of the Congo which has had some benefits, but eventually is not doing the country any good. There seems to be constant fighting there because the leaders all have ulterior motives, or there is not a stable leader in power. There are lots of political issues that have been going on throughout the Congo's history, but especially as of late. It seems like ever since they gained their independence from the Belgians that they are free but there is still lots of political turmoil and war. People are still dying and the UN is not really doing that much that will actually help the people of the Congo.
2. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/02/world/africa/02congo.html?scp=4&sq=congo&st=cse
This article is about how the UN just recently released a report about the killings and abuse in the Congo from 1993-2003. It is over 550 pages long and interviews thousands of people about their experiences. There are issues with the report however because the other countries listed in it are not listed favorably. There are arguments about whether genocide is the correct word to use in this situation. This is the same sort of question that Hochschild had about Leopold's regime. He said technically it could not be considered a genocide because he did not intentionally go in trying to kill any one certain race. I do think that the things going on in the Congo today and concerning the Congo were affected by the things going on during Leopold's regime.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/africa/10/05/congo.rapes.arrest/index.html?iref=allsearch
This article is about how the alleged leader of a Congo military group was arrested the other day on the accusation of committing mass rapes in the Congo. A report published last month confirmed that over 300 people were raped between July and August in one region of the Congo. It focused on shortcomings of the military and their inability to protect the people in their areas. Victims were told that the main reasons for these attacks were to punish people viewed as traitors. The things that happened during Leopold's rule did have an effect on the things going on now. There are still terrible happenings just as there were during Leopold's rule. The military under Leopold's rule were abusive to the natives, just as this article is talking about for modern times.
2. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/02/world/africa/02congo.html?scp=4&sq=congo&st=cse
This article is about how the UN just recently released a report about the killings and abuse in the Congo from 1993-2003. It is over 550 pages long and interviews thousands of people about their experiences. There are issues with the report however because the other countries listed in it are not listed favorably. There are arguments about whether genocide is the correct word to use in this situation. This is the same sort of question that Hochschild had about Leopold's regime. He said technically it could not be considered a genocide because he did not intentionally go in trying to kill any one certain race. I do think that the things going on in the Congo today and concerning the Congo were affected by the things going on during Leopold's regime.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/africa/10/05/congo.rapes.arrest/index.html?iref=allsearch
This article is about how the alleged leader of a Congo military group was arrested the other day on the accusation of committing mass rapes in the Congo. A report published last month confirmed that over 300 people were raped between July and August in one region of the Congo. It focused on shortcomings of the military and their inability to protect the people in their areas. Victims were told that the main reasons for these attacks were to punish people viewed as traitors. The things that happened during Leopold's rule did have an effect on the things going on now. There are still terrible happenings just as there were during Leopold's rule. The military under Leopold's rule were abusive to the natives, just as this article is talking about for modern times.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)